Research Methods – DT840 and beyond, review of course books
As announced in my earlier post on Research Methods and Skills
I am providing here a brief review of the books which present the set books in my current post-graduate course on research skills and statistics, i.e. the Open University post-graduate course DT840 (DTZY840). The assessment (5 assignments and an exam) is based on the following materials:
LE VOI, M., Sapsford, R., Potter, S., Green, A., Redman, P. and Yates S. (2008) DT840 Course and Study Guide. Milton Keynes: The Open University
POTTER, S (2nd ed.) (2006) Doing Postgraduate Research. London: Sage.
This set book by Stephen Potter – OU Professor, specialist in transport strategies, and course team members – is available on Amazon. There is also a companion which contains related links and chapter excerpts: Potter companion on Sage which, unfortunately, appears to be neglected: 3 listed links out of 4, supposed to connect to ethical frameworks, turn out to be broken. Some of the course assessment is based on the online sources which you will need to find elsewhere. I have listed ethical guidelines in a separate box on the right hand within this blog.
SAPSFORD, R. (2nd ed.) (2007) Survey Research. London: Sage.
Also this one is available on Amazon, interested readers can: search inside. The reviews on Amazon are throughout very negative and the reviewers have gone into great detail with their substantiated critique. It’s helpful to read them and keep in mind the following problems with the material:
- Lack of a glossary
- Minimalist link list and Index
- Key concepts such as triangulation not mentioned
- Discusses online research settings only very briefly, insufficient
- References to chapters/figures/boxes/tables rather than to pages
- 1st edition had attracted equally negative reviews
- 16 pages contain substantial errors: in formulae, explanations of concepts, tables are wrongly labelled etc. Luckily the OU provides a list of corrections, but it’s not comprehensive and you will need to constantly check and correct.
- Carelessly compiled bibliography: referencing appears to follow random systems and lacks consistency (the OU prefers Harvard referencing style also in this course).
- Unclear structure with a wordy approach
[N.B. To make matters worse: NO previous exams available – as common for the majority of courses on OUSA site, yet 1 exam specimen paper is delivered by OU.]
Here is a site which lists Sapsford’s content without providing any evaluation: Sapsford content, overview by OU student.
About Britta Bohlinger, CFEFounder and Director of RisikoKlár in Iceland. Native German, global perspective - previously in London and Berlin.
- A chilling taster of things to come - the deafening international silence following the #IPCC report on… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 4 days ago
- Irresponsible demand: plastic, fertilizer and pharmaceutical companies continue to swamp the planet with plastic an… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- Self-destruction inbuilt: #artfraud or sarcastic prank? Banksy's Girl with Balloon, valued at over USD1mn, leaves S… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- I have previously published and spoken about Germany's #Mittelstand being in a state of crippling fear due to Chine… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
- In contrast to common belief: tracing a #cryptocurrency transaction and tracing it back is possible with public dat… twitter.com/i/web/status/1… 1 week ago
Translate my blog into your language
- 88,497 hits
- data analysis
- data collection
- discourse analysis
- editing and publishing
- informal learning
- online collaboration tools
- online tutorials
- real world
- research design
- research resources
- social media and education
- sociology of the internet
- virtual worlds